World Rugby details hip-drop tackle sanctions as new ban takes effect
World Rugby has issued November guidance explaining how officials should sanction hip-drop tackles after an explicit ban took effect on 1 November. The governing body’s updated advice distinguishes between legal tackles, offences warranting a penalty and more dangerous actions requiring cards, based on the action and danger involved.
Watch the highlights: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fr2oti78z4
The amendment to Law 9.13 followed Executive Board approval on 28 September. World Rugby defines the prohibited action as a defender taking hold from the side or behind, swinging around or through the carrier and dropping bodyweight onto the carrier’s lower limbs while bringing them down. A conventional tackle from behind without that swing or drop remains legal under the guidance.
Where the swinging action produces only minimal lower-limb contact, the specified sanction is a penalty. More substantial contact can warrant a yellow or red card, assessed against the danger involved. Officials must consider control, whether the tackler is airborne, the carrier’s speed, the suddenness of the movement and the impact on the limb. Intentional or premeditated foul play can bring a permanent red card in elite rugby.
The clarification comes alongside a broader effort to align international officiating. BBC Sport reported that the top 24 international head coaches met World Rugby officials outside London, raising questions about scrums, breakdowns, deliberate knock-ons and foul play during scoring attempts. A subsequent officials’ conference addressed scrum refereeing, foul play and the Television Match Official’s role, with former coach Jonathan Humphreys leading the scrum presentation.
Charles Richardson’s reporting for The Telegraph, carried by Yahoo Sports, described detailed instructions on improving scrum stability. Referees were reminded to check that loosehead props do not tuck their right shoulders and that hookers use a brake foot. Warren Gatland, working as a World Rugby consultant, helped demonstrate the required positioning during the session. The emphasis was on addressing setup problems before they develop into unstable scrums.
Video officials were also told to prioritise foul play and try-scoring incidents, according to The Telegraph’s account. Intervention should address clear errors rather than pursue perfection in every passage of play. Together, the briefings and published tackle guidance set out both technical priorities for referees and a graduated approach to assessing dangerous contact.
Comments
0No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!